The best Side of case law 395 ppc acquittal
The best Side of case law 395 ppc acquittal
Blog Article
“There is not any ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any in the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din noticed firstly the deceased and after far they saw the petitioners going towards the same direction, didn't necessarily mean that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. This sort of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of previous observed.
101 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Subject: Appeal At times it truly is hassle-free for just a Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to generate an attempt to eliminate a case on merit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's got reached to your stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for merit disposal when it's got reached this sort of stage. Read more
Therefore, this petition is found to get not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), and the petitioners may possibly seek out remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
This unfortunate ambiguity results within the regulation regarding murder and manslaughter to generally be repugnant with Every other.
record in the department there is no record available whatsoever regarding promotion on the petitioner(Promotion)
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, it is also a properly-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is subject matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.
be established without an iota of doubt in all other jurisdictions) will be inferred. This is a horrifying reality, an incredibly very low threshold for an offence that carries capital punishment.
The issue Here's that an accused may say that they meant to injure the sufferer, but they did not plan to destroy them. In other words, they might claim that thedeath that resulted due to accused’s attack was neither foreseeable nor intended.
This ruling has conditions, and Considering that here the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based around the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances with the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 in the Constitution. Read more
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability within the matter, but could not be answerable in almost any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this type of ruling, the defendants took their request for the appellate court.
Performing a case regulation search may very well be as easy as moving into specific keywords or citation into a search engine. There are, however, certain websites that facilitate case regulation searches, which include:
Article 199 with the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by law." It truly is perfectly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition towards the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Advancement Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of an electricity grid station in their neighborhood, on designated “green belt” property. The Court read the matter like a human rights case, as Article 184 (three) in the Pakistan Constitution presents authentic jurisdiction towards the Supreme Court to take up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a twelve-year previous boy from his home to protect him from the Awful physical and sexual abuse he had suffered in his home, and also to prevent him from abusing other children within the home. The boy was placed within an unexpected emergency foster home, and was later shifted about within the foster care system.